Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Sauls

200 So. 366, 146 Fla. 166
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 366 (Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Sauls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Sauls, 200 So. 366, 146 Fla. 166 (Fla. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the court below is affirmed upon the authority of Burton v. McMillan, 52 Fla. 469, 42 So. 849, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 991, 120 A. S. R. 220, 11 Ann. Cas. 380, and Sheldon v. Wilfore, 136 Fla. 312, 186 So. 508. See also 17 Am. Juris. 888-889. There was ample evidence before the chancellor to sustain his decree under the authority of the above cited cases. No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Terrell, Buford, Chapman and Adams, J. J., concur. Thomas, J., dissents. Whitfield, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheldon v. Wilfore
186 So. 508 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Burton v. McMillan
42 So. 849 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 So. 366, 146 Fla. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-of-baltimore-v-sauls-fla-1941.