Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Sauls

200 So. 366, 146 Fla. 166
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the court below is affirmed upon the authority of Burton v. McMillan, 52 Fla. 469, 42 So. 849, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 991, 120 A. S. R. 220, 11 Ann. Cas. 380, and Sheldon v. Wilfore, 136 Fla. 312, 186 So. 508. See also 17 Am. Juris. 888-889. There was ample evidence before the chancellor to sustain his decree under the authority of the above cited cases. No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Terrell, Buford, Chapman and Adams, J. J., concur. Thomas, J., dissents. Whitfield, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Sauls, 200 So. 366, 146 Fla. 166 (Fla. 1941).

200 So. 366 (Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Sauls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheldon v. Wilfore
186 So. 508 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Burton v. McMillan
52 Fla. 469 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)