Mary Usher v. United States of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant

Third Circuit

Mary Usher v. United States of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant

454 F.2d 728

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 7, 1972·No. 71-2890·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT;

It appears from the record in this case that the United States has dismissed its appeal, that Atlanta Transit System, Inc., has suffered no legal consequences from the judgment below as it has been given full credit for the amount it has paid pursuant to a previous state court judgment between it and the plaintiff-appellee, and that there now remains no actual controversy between and among the parties. This appeal is dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT;

It appears from the record in this case that the United States has dismissed its appeal, that Atlanta Transit System, Inc., has suffered no legal consequences from the judgment below as it has been given full credit for the amount it has paid pursuant to a previous state court judgment between it and the plaintiff-appellee, and that there now remains no actual controversy between and among the parties. This appeal is dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

Mary Usher v. United States of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant, 454 F.2d 728 (3d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

454 F.2d 728 (Mary Usher v. United States of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.