Mary U. Doucet and Semar Doucet v. The Travelers Insurance Company and A. W. Dunn

Fifth Circuit

Mary U. Doucet and Semar Doucet v. The Travelers Insurance Company and A. W. Dunn

362 F.2d 263, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5866

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 10, 1966·No. 22794·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants are appealing from an adverse judgment entered on their separate claims for damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between their automobile and a truck on U. S. Highway 71 in Louisiana. The passenger’s suit against his driver’s insurance carrier was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the policy limits were under $10,000.00. The jury found against the driver in her action.

We have carefully examined all questions presented by each of the appellants, and conclude that the record shows no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellants are appealing from an adverse judgment entered on their separate claims for damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between their automobile and a truck on U. S. Highway 71 in Louisiana. The passenger’s suit against his driver’s insurance carrier was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the policy limits were under $10,000.00. The jury found against the driver in her action.

We have carefully examined all questions presented by each of the appellants, and conclude that the record shows no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Mary U. Doucet and Semar Doucet v. The Travelers Insurance Company and A. W. Dunn, 362 F.2d 263, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5866 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

362 F.2d 263 (Mary U. Doucet and Semar Doucet v. The Travelers Insurance Company and A. W. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related