Mary Smith v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 28, 2005
Docket13-05-00390-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mary Smith v. State (Mary Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary Smith v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

          NUMBER 13-05-390-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

MARY SMITH,                                                         Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                  On appeal from the 214th District Court

                            of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Castillo and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, MARY SMITH, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-CR-1559-F(S1).  Judgment in this cause was signed on September 23, 2004.  No timely motion for new trial was filed.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on October 25, 2004, but was not filed until October 27, 2004. 

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect her appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28th day of July, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mary Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-smith-v-state-texapp-2005.