MARY SMITH-SANTANA v. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
This text of MARY SMITH-SANTANA v. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL (MARY SMITH-SANTANA v. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
MARY SMITH-SANTANA,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 2D23-2234 LT Case No. 2022-CA-005441 SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
Appellee. /
Opinion filed January 26, 2024
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Patricia Muscarella, Judge.
Mary Smith-Santana, Tarpon Springs, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ivy Pereira Rollins, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).
LAMBERT, BRIAN D., EDWARDS, JAMES, A., and JAY, HARVEY, Associates Judges, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARY SMITH-SANTANA v. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-smith-santana-v-second-district-court-of-appeal-fladistctapp-2024.