Mary Olive Calkins, by and Through Agent-In-Fact, Richard Stephen Calkins v. Susan Gardner and Crain, Caton & James, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mary Olive Calkins, by and Through Agent-In-Fact, Richard Stephen Calkins v. Susan Gardner and Crain, Caton & James, P.C.

DecidedJune 25, 2015

Docket01-15-00283-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Mary Olive Calkins, by and Through Agent-In-Fact, Richard Stephen Calkins v. Susan Gardner and Crain, Caton & James, P.C. (Mary Olive Calkins, by and Through Agent-In-Fact, Richard Stephen Calkins v. Susan Gardner and Crain, Caton & James, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mary Olive Calkins, by and Through Agent-In-Fact, Richard Stephen Calkins v. Susan Gardner and Crain, Caton & James, P.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued June 23, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00283-CV ——————————— MARY OLIVE CALKINS, BY AND THROUGH AGENT-IN-FACT, RICHARD STEPHEN CALKINS, Appellant V. SUSAN GARDNER AND CRAIN, CATON & JAMES, P.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2008-75812-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 2, 2015, appellant, Mary Olive Calkins, by and through agent-in-

fact Richard Stephen Calkins, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued and the certificate of conference

indicates the motion is unopposed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI