Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman

Fifth Circuit

Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman

271 F.2d 267

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 10, 1959·No. 17822_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court concluded, on the authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Futch, 5 Cir., 263 F.2d 701, certiorari denied 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed. 2d 1547, that the plaintiff had failed to make out a case of liability of the defendant and directed a verdict for the defendant on which judgment was entered. We agree that the cited case is controlling and the judgment of the district court is, therefore.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The district court concluded, on the authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Futch, 5 Cir., 263 F.2d 701, certiorari denied 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed. 2d 1547, that the plaintiff had failed to make out a case of liability of the defendant and directed a verdict for the defendant on which judgment was entered. We agree that the cited case is controlling and the judgment of the district court is, therefore.

Affirmed.

Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman, 271 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

271 F.2d 267 (Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related