Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman

Fifth Circuit

Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman

271 F.2d 267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 10, 1959

Docket17822_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 271 F.2d 267 (Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mary Lucille Brabham v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and W. H. Hyman, 271 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court concluded, on the authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Futch, 5 Cir., 263 F.2d 701, certiorari denied 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed. 2d 1547, that the plaintiff had failed to make out a case of liability of the defendant and directed a verdict for the defendant on which judgment was entered. We agree that the cited case is controlling and the judgment of the district court is, therefore.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The district court concluded, on the authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Futch, 5 Cir., 263 F.2d 701, certiorari denied 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed. 2d 1547, that the plaintiff had failed to make out a case of liability of the defendant and directed a verdict for the defendant on which judgment was entered. We agree that the cited case is controlling and the judgment of the district court is, therefore.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 F.2d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-lucille-brabham-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-company-and-w-h-ca5-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack