Mary Louise Serafine v. the Honorable Karin Crump, the Honorable Bob Pemberton, the Honorable Melissa Goodwin, and the Honorable David Puryear

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2023
Docket03-21-00053-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mary Louise Serafine v. the Honorable Karin Crump, the Honorable Bob Pemberton, the Honorable Melissa Goodwin, and the Honorable David Puryear (Mary Louise Serafine v. the Honorable Karin Crump, the Honorable Bob Pemberton, the Honorable Melissa Goodwin, and the Honorable David Puryear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary Louise Serafine v. the Honorable Karin Crump, the Honorable Bob Pemberton, the Honorable Melissa Goodwin, and the Honorable David Puryear, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2023

NO. 03-21-00053-CV

Mary Louise Serafine, Appellant

v.

The Honorable Karin Crump, The Honorable Bob Pemberton, The Honorable Melissa Goodwin, and The Honorable David Puryear, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH AFFIRMED IN PART; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION – OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from interlocutory orders signed by the trial court on January 8, 2021. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the portion of the First Order finding appellant to be a vexatious litigant and ordering pre-

filing relief or in the portion of the Second Order finding appellant to be a vexatious litigant and

ordering pre-filing relief. Therefore, the Court affirms those portions of the trial court’s

interlocutory orders. The Court further holds that there were portions of those orders, and other

orders, over which this Court has no interlocutory jurisdiction, and the Court dismisses the

attempted appeal from those other interlocutory orders or portions of the interlocutory orders.

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mary Louise Serafine v. the Honorable Karin Crump, the Honorable Bob Pemberton, the Honorable Melissa Goodwin, and the Honorable David Puryear, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-louise-serafine-v-the-honorable-karin-crump-the-honorable-bob-texapp-2023.