Mary Louise Diamond-Rosenfeld v. Thaddeus S. Sims

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 3, 2013·No. 05-12-01452-CV·Published

Opinion

I)lSIlSS; Opinion tiled January 3, 2013

In The uf itiiah (Itiurt .FiftIi Ji!trIrt nf Y.ixa at Ja11ai No. 05-12-01452-CV

MARY LOUISE DIAMOND-ROSENFELD, Appellant

V.

TIIADDEUS S. SIMS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. I Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-i 1-2767-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers Opinion By Chief Justice Wright

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant informs the Court

that she no longer desires to pursue the appeal. Accordingly. we grant appellant’s motion and

dismiss the appeal. See FEX. R. Ape. P. 42.l(a)(i).

z V

CAROl 1RlGJA’?’ /

7/ ZHIEF /7 JUSTJCE /7• / / / .7 121452F.P05 / / (fnitrt nf Appca1 Fift1! Jitrict rf rxai at Ja1ht

JUDGMENT MARY LOUISE DIAMOND-ROSENFELD, Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 of Appellant Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. PR-Il 2767-I). No. 05-1 2 -01452-CV V. C)pinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright and J u st Ce S Franc i s and Lang Mi e rs. —

TIIADDEUS S. SIMS. Appellee participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, Thaddeus S. Sims, recover his costs of the appeal from appellant, Mary Louise Diamond-Rosenfeld.

Judgment entered January 3. 2013.

— —

CAROLYN WRl&I1 (JIIEF4USFICF /

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary Louise Diamond-Rosenfeld v. Thaddeus S. Sims, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Mary Louise Diamond-Rosenfeld v. Thaddeus S. Sims (Mary Louise Diamond-Rosenfeld v. Thaddeus S. Sims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.