Mary L. Johnson, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Leroy Johnson, Deceased and Loretta Johnson, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Herbert D. Johnson, Deceased v. Better Materials Corporation (Defendant Third-Party in d.c.) v. Atlantic City Electric Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey(third-Party in d.c.)

556 F.2d 131
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedNovember 23, 1976
Docket76-1185
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 F.2d 131 (Mary L. Johnson, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Leroy Johnson, Deceased and Loretta Johnson, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Herbert D. Johnson, Deceased v. Better Materials Corporation (Defendant Third-Party in d.c.) v. Atlantic City Electric Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey(third-Party in d.c.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary L. Johnson, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Leroy Johnson, Deceased and Loretta Johnson, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Herbert D. Johnson, Deceased v. Better Materials Corporation (Defendant Third-Party in d.c.) v. Atlantic City Electric Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey(third-Party in d.c.), 556 F.2d 131 (3d Cir. 1976).

Opinion

556 F.2d 131

Mary L. JOHNSON, Administratrix ad Prosequendum and General
Administratrix of the Estate of Leroy Johnson, Deceased and
Loretta Johnson, Administratrix ad Prosequendum and General
Administratrix of the Estate of Herbert D. Johnson, Deceased
v.
BETTER MATERIALS CORPORATION (Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff in D.C.)
v.
ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY, a corporation of the State
of New Jersey(Third-Party Defendant in D.C.), Appellant.

No. 76-1185.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 14, 1976.
Decided Nov. 23, 1976.

James E. Franklin, II, Lloyd, Megargee, Steedle & Connor, Pleasantville, N. J., for appellant.

Gerald M. Eisenstat, Shapiro, Eisenstat, Capizola, O'Neill, Lisitski & Gabage, P. A., Vineland, N. J., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and ALDISERT and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The question raised on this interlocutory appeal is whether plaintiffs may assert a state-law claim against Atlantic City Electric Company, a third-party defendant, when plaintiffs and Atlantic City are all citizens of New Jersey. On the basis of our precedents, we conclude that they may not. E. g., Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227 (3d Cir. 1976); Patton v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 197 F.2d 732 (3d Cir. 1952).

The order allowing plaintiffs to amend their complaint to include Atlantic City as an original party defendant will be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bond v. Doig
433 F. Supp. 243 (D. New Jersey, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 F.2d 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-l-johnson-administratrix-ad-prosequendum-and-general-administratrix-ca3-1976.