MARY L. HARRIS AND ARTESE HARRIS v. NICOLE N. ARTY, SABRINA WILLIAMS (L-1189-16 ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
This text of MARY L. HARRIS AND ARTESE HARRIS v. NICOLE N. ARTY, SABRINA WILLIAMS (L-1189-16 ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (MARY L. HARRIS AND ARTESE HARRIS v. NICOLE N. ARTY, SABRINA WILLIAMS (L-1189-16 ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and i ts use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0519-18T3
MARY L. HARRIS and ARTESE HARRIS,
Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
NICOLE N. ARTY, SABRINA WILLIAMS,
Defendants-Respondents,
and
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant,
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Intervenor-Respondent.
Submitted June 2, 2020 - Decided June 29, 2020
Before Judges Accurso, Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. L-1189-16.
Cooper Maren Nitsberg Voss & DeCoursey attorneys for appellant (Benjamin O. Stewart, on the brief).
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter, attorneys for intervenor-respondent GEICO Indemnity Company (Michael J. Marone and Richard J. Williams, of counsel and on the brief; Eric G. Siegel, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Last term, we granted Drive New Jersey Insurance Company
(Progressive), plaintiffs' UIM carrier, leave to appeal the trial court's July 3
2018 order declaring GEICO had no duty to defend or indemnify its defendant
insureds, whose Florida auto policy provided no bodily injury liability
coverage, based on that court's view that the "deemer statute," N.J.S.A. 17:28-
1.4, did not require GEICO to provide New Jersey's compulsory minimum
bodily injury limits of $15,000 per person/$30,000 per accident. After the case
was calendared, the Supreme Court granted certification in Felix v. Richards,
236 N.J. 117 (2018), presenting the same issue raised in this appeal. We
determined, with the consent of the parties, to delay decision in this matter
pending the Court's decision in Felix.
A-0519-18T3 2 Following the Court's recent opinion in Felix, holding that insurers such
as GEICO that write auto policies in New Jersey, remain obligated under the
deemer statute to guarantee New Jersey's $15,000/$30,000 bodily injury
liability limits in their out-of-state policies regardless of the actual terms of
those policies, Felix v. Richards, 241 N.J. 169, 174-75 (2020), and the Court's
denial of GEICO's motion for reconsideration, the parties agree that the trial
court's order to the contrary must be reversed and Progressive dismissed
because its UIM coverage is not triggered. Accordingly, we reverse the July 3,
2018 order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and
Felix. We do not retain jurisdiction.
Reversed and remanded.
A-0519-18T3 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARY L. HARRIS AND ARTESE HARRIS v. NICOLE N. ARTY, SABRINA WILLIAMS (L-1189-16 ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-l-harris-and-artese-harris-v-nicole-n-arty-sabrina-williams-njsuperctappdiv-2020.