Mary Kathryn Smith v. United States
This text of 251 F.2d 819 (Mary Kathryn Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary Kathryn SMITH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 16475.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
January 30, 1958.
Rehearing Denied February 25, 1958.
Charles W. Tessmer, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
William N. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minor Morgan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Heard L. Floore, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals from a conviction under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2313, of selling in Dallas, Texas, two automobiles which had been stolen in Wichita, Kansas, and which she knew had been stolen. The questions raised are not, in our opinion, substantial, and the errors, if any there were, at the trial, were harmless. The evidence was more than sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilt. The judgment appealed from is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 F.2d 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-kathryn-smith-v-united-states-ca5-1958.