Mary Kathryn Castle Steinway v. Ritz Theatre, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation

180 F.2d 174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1950
Docket3902_1
StatusPublished

This text of 180 F.2d 174 (Mary Kathryn Castle Steinway v. Ritz Theatre, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary Kathryn Castle Steinway v. Ritz Theatre, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, 180 F.2d 174 (10th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

180 F.2d 174

Mary Kathryn Castle STEINWAY
v.
RITZ THEATRE, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, et al.

No. 3902.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

January 24, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

Neal E. McNeill, Tulsa, Okl., for appellant.

Charles B. Cochran, Oklahoma City, Okl., and Gentry Lee, Tulsa, Okl., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed January 24, 1950, without written opinion per stipulation, on authority of case. Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co., 179 F.2d 681.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.
179 F.2d 681 (Tenth Circuit, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 F.2d 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-kathryn-castle-steinway-v-ritz-theatre-inc-an-ca10-1950.