Mary Kate Utsey, as of the Estate of C. H. Utsey, and C. D. Utsey v. Southern Railroad Company

362 F.2d 472, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5922
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1966·No. 10378·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action for damages allegedly sustained by a lower riparian owner as a result of the defendant’s operation of its ponds and its ditching of its forest 'lands, a jury found a verdict for the defendant. Our consideration of the record in the light of the briefs and oral argument convinces us that there was no fundamental unfairness in the submission of the factual issues, and that the jury’s verdict effectively determined them.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary Kate Utsey, as of the Estate of C. H. Utsey, and C. D. Utsey v. Southern Railroad Company, 362 F.2d 472, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5922 (4th Cir. 1966).

362 F.2d 472 (Mary Kate Utsey, as of the Estate of C. H. Utsey, and C. D. Utsey v. Southern Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related