Mary Jo Freehill v. James T. Benn

Fourth Circuit

Mary Jo Freehill v. James T. Benn

348 F.2d 911, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4846

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 1965

Docket10022

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 348 F.2d 911 (Mary Jo Freehill v. James T. Benn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mary Jo Freehill v. James T. Benn, 348 F.2d 911, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4846 (4th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mary Jo Freehill complained of James T. Benn in the District Court in two counts. The first exhibited, and asked judgment upon, a default judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the County of Dade, Florida against Benn and in favor of Freehill. The second count pleaded the same facts and prayed the same relief as that alleged and granted in the Florida action. Benn’s motion to dismiss the first count was sustained. The ground of the ruling was that the judgment was not entitled to accordance of Constitutional full faith and credit, because he had not been served with process in that action. Hence he could not be held in default for failure to appear and defend.

The dismissal of the first count was made final and appealable by direction of the trial court. F.R.Civ.P. 54(b). On appeal, plaintiff shows that the return of service in Florida recites that Benn was there personally and appropriately served. The presumption of the execution of the writ arising from this certificate, Freehill urges, was not overridden by the evidence adduced by Benn on the motion.

Defendant testified that he was never served and, in truth, was not in Florida at the time of the service as returned. This claim the District Judge found adequately corroborated by supplementing proof. As his finding is certainly not clearly erroneous, F.R.Civ.P. 52(a), we affirm his judgment.

The disposition of this case renders moot the appellant Freehill’s motion here for a stay of the trial on Count 2 in the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mary Jo Freehill complained of James T. Benn in the District Court in two counts. The first exhibited, and asked judgment upon, a default judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the County of Dade, Florida against Benn and in favor of Freehill. The second count pleaded the same facts and prayed the same relief as that alleged and granted in the Florida action. Benn’s motion to dismiss the first count was sustained. The ground of the ruling was that the judgment was not entitled to accordance of Constitutional full faith and credit, because he had not been served with process in that action. Hence he could not be held in default for failure to appear and defend.

The dismissal of the first count was made final and appealable by direction of the trial court. F.R.Civ.P. 54(b). On appeal, plaintiff shows that the return of service in Florida recites that Benn was there personally and appropriately served. The presumption of the execution of the writ arising from this certificate, Freehill urges, was not overridden by the evidence adduced by Benn on the motion.

Defendant testified that he was never served and, in truth, was not in Florida at the time of the service as returned. This claim the District Judge found adequately corroborated by supplementing proof. As his finding is certainly not clearly erroneous, F.R.Civ.P. 52(a), we affirm his judgment.

The disposition of this case renders moot the appellant Freehill’s motion here for a stay of the trial on Count 2 in the District Court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 F.2d 911, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-jo-freehill-v-james-t-benn-ca4-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack