Mary Hsiao Yung Wang v. Chei Fong Lee

110 A.D.3d 1060, 974 N.Y.S.2d 256

This text of 110 A.D.3d 1060 (Mary Hsiao Yung Wang v. Chei Fong Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary Hsiao Yung Wang v. Chei Fong Lee, 110 A.D.3d 1060, 974 N.Y.S.2d 256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In an action to determine ownership of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered April 21, 2011, which, inter alia, denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s untimely motion for summary judgment in view of her failure to offer any explanation for not serving the motion within 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, as required by CPLR 3212 (a) (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648 [2004]; Soltes v 260 Waverly Owners, Inc., 42 AD3d 565 [2007]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brill v. City of New York
814 N.E.2d 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Soltes v. 260 Waverly Owners, Inc.
42 A.D.3d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.3d 1060, 974 N.Y.S.2d 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-hsiao-yung-wang-v-chei-fong-lee-nyappdiv-2013.