Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided October 20, 2021·No. 2020-0490·Unpublished

Opinion

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2020-0490, Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley, the court on October 20, 2021, issued the following order:

The defendant’s motion for leave to replace certain black and white photographs in her appendix with color photographs is granted.

Having considered the briefs, memorandum of law, and record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the defendant has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed.

MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley, (N.H. 2021).

Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley (Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ralph P. Gallo & a. v. Susan Traina & a.
166 N.H. 737 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2014)