Mary F. Phillips v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services

848 F.2d 66, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8523, 1988 WL 60610
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1988·No. 87-1401·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion March 14, 1988, 5th Cir.1988, 839 F.2d 1075)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner, defendant-appellee Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, requests rehearing because he claims that the panel’s decision that the Secretary acted in bad faith in the case of Mary Phillips is based upon a factual error. See Baker v. Bowen, 839 F.2d 1075, 1087 (5th Cir.1988). As he acknowledges in his petition, however, any error that may have occurred was caused by the Secretary’s own failure to present the argument now made in support of the petition, either on appeal or to the district court. It is simply too late at this juncture to present a new factual argument. For this reason the petition for rehearing is hereby

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary F. Phillips v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, 848 F.2d 66, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8523, 1988 WL 60610 (5th Cir. 1988).

848 F.2d 66 (Mary F. Phillips v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related