Mary F. Masterson v. BCHH Title of Texas, LLC, Julius Hardy and ARVM5, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 2023·No. 01-23-00048-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 23, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00048-CV ——————————— MARY F. MASTERSON, Appellant V. BCHH TITLE OF TEXAS, LLC, JULIUS HARDY AND ARVM5, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022-10619

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss her permissive appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 28.3, 42.1(a)(1); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d). Although

appellant failed to include a certificate of conference in her motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of service, more than 10 days have passed since the

motion was filed, and no party has opposed the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss her permissive appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We also dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary F. Masterson v. BCHH Title of Texas, LLC, Julius Hardy and ARVM5, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Mary F. Masterson v. BCHH Title of Texas, LLC, Julius Hardy and ARVM5, LLC (Mary F. Masterson v. BCHH Title of Texas, LLC, Julius Hardy and ARVM5, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 51.014
Texas CP § 51.014(d)