Mary Elizabeth Leatherman A/K/A Mary Bethel v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 24, 2007
Docket04-06-00768-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mary Elizabeth Leatherman A/K/A Mary Bethel v. State (Mary Elizabeth Leatherman A/K/A Mary Bethel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary Elizabeth Leatherman A/K/A Mary Bethel v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-06-00768-CR

Mary Elizabeth LEATHERMAN a/k/a Mary Bethel,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CR-9070W

Honorable Juanita Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding



PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 24, 2007

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On January 9, 2006, appellant was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for a period of five years. On September 7, 2006, the State filed a motion to enter an adjudication of guilt and to revoke appellant's community supervision. On October 27, 2006, the trial court entered an order continuing appellant on deferred adjudication and modifying the terms of appellant's community supervision. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's order modifying the conditions of her community supervision. This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order altering or modifying the conditions of community supervision. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no pet.). On December 7, 2006, this court issued an order for appellant to show cause on or before December 22, 2006 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's appointed counsel responded, and conceded that appellant has no right to appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Basaldua v. State
558 S.W.2d 2 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Quaglia v. State
906 S.W.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mary Elizabeth Leatherman A/K/A Mary Bethel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-elizabeth-leatherman-aka-mary-bethel-v-state-texapp-2007.