Mary Elizabeth Gould v. Mark W. Lee

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 1, 2013·No. 02-13-00085-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00085-CV

MARY ELIZABETH GOULD APPELLANT

V.

MARK W. LEE APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On July 10, 2013, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: August 1, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary Elizabeth Gould v. Mark W. Lee, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Mary Elizabeth Gould v. Mark W. Lee (Mary Elizabeth Gould v. Mark W. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.