Mary E. Armentrout v. Columbia Federal Savings and Loan Association, Lee W. Cowan, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Peter v. Trzpis, Intervenor

D.C. Circuit

Mary E. Armentrout v. Columbia Federal Savings and Loan Association, Lee W. Cowan, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Peter v. Trzpis, Intervenor

253 F.2d 876, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 354, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4902

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 30, 1958

Docket14100

StatusPublished

This text of 253 F.2d 876 (Mary E. Armentrout v. Columbia Federal Savings and Loan Association, Lee W. Cowan, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Peter v. Trzpis, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mary E. Armentrout v. Columbia Federal Savings and Loan Association, Lee W. Cowan, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Peter v. Trzpis, Intervenor, 253 F.2d 876, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 354, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4902 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

*877 PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied a motion filed by defendant Armentrout for restraint of the sale of certain property in satisfaction of the plaintiff Association’s judgment lien against the defendant Trzpis and for “dismissal” of that lien. At the time of the issuance of the District Court’s order defendant Trzpis had been adjudged bankrupt. This fact was brought to our attention by intervention of the trustee in bankruptcy; it was not before the trial court. We therefore remand the case to that court for reconsideration in the light of the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings. For the purpose of the remand the order of the District Court must be vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*877 PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied a motion filed by defendant Armentrout for restraint of the sale of certain property in satisfaction of the plaintiff Association’s judgment lien against the defendant Trzpis and for “dismissal” of that lien. At the time of the issuance of the District Court’s order defendant Trzpis had been adjudged bankrupt. This fact was brought to our attention by intervention of the trustee in bankruptcy; it was not before the trial court. We therefore remand the case to that court for reconsideration in the light of the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings. For the purpose of the remand the order of the District Court must be vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F.2d 876, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 354, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-e-armentrout-v-columbia-federal-savings-and-loan-association-lee-w-cadc-1958.