Mary Dorner v. Earl Brock Jr.
This text of Mary Dorner v. Earl Brock Jr. (Mary Dorner v. Earl Brock Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 25, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24D0400. MARY DORNER v. EARL BROCK JR.
The application for discretionary review filed by applicant Mary Dorner is hereby GRANTED. Dorner shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the superior court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). If Dorner already has filed a notice of appeal in the superior court, then she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. Respondent Earl Brock, Jr.’s request for sanctions is hereby DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta, July 25, 2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mary Dorner v. Earl Brock Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-dorner-v-earl-brock-jr-gactapp-2024.