Mary C. Westphal v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 317 F.2d 365 (Mary C. Westphal v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary C. WESTPHAL et al., Appellants
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 17059.
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.
May 21, 1963.
W. B. McCallum, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.
Louis Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Tax Div., Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel and Charles Owen Johnson, Atty., Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petition to review decision of Tax Court dismissed with prejudice on stipulation. 37 T.C. 340.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
317 F.2d 365, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-c-westphal-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca8-1963.