Mary Bowes v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

443 F.2d 30, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11232
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 22, 1971·No. 26275·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The final order for deportation is affirmed.

Mary Bowes is a teacher and an alien. She overstayed the length of her non-immigrant permission. She does not want to go home.

At issue here is Immigration’s refusal to delay proceedings because she had a petition pending at the Department of Labor for a sixth preference for admission as an immigrant. This, she says, deprived her of due process. The pendency of an application for immigration status, however, does not entitle an alien to a delay in deportation proceedings. See Manantan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 7 Cir., 425 F.2d 693, and Amarante v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 326 F.2d 58.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary Bowes v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 443 F.2d 30, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11232 (9th Cir. 1971).

443 F.2d 30 (Mary Bowes v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manta v. Mukasey
263 F. App'x 626 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Noel v. Chapman
508 F.2d 1023 (Second Circuit, 1975)
MERCED
14 I. & N. Dec. 644 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1974)
LENNON
15 I. & N. Dec. 9 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1974)
ALARAS
14 I. & N. Dec. 287 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1973)