Mary Bohannan v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-08-00070-CV
Appellants, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, and City of Amarillo// Cross-Appellant, Southwestern Public Service Company
v.
Appellee, Southwestern Public Service Company//Cross-Apellees, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, and City of Amarillo
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-07-000541, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed a joint motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment, reinstate the Commission’s final order, and dismiss all appeals, explaining that they have reached a settlement agreement. We reinstate the cause and grant the parties’ motion, set aside the trial court’s judgment, reinstate the Commission’s final order in PUC Docket No. 32685, and dismiss all appeals and the cross-appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2) (on agreed motion to dismiss, court may render judgment effectuating parties’ agreement).
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Puryear and Henson Dismissed on Joint Motion Filed: August 5, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mary Bohannan v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Mary Bohannan v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.