Mary Anne Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital

Michigan Supreme Court

Mary Anne Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital

DecidedJanuary 23, 2020

Docket160655

StatusPublished

This text of Mary Anne Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital (Mary Anne Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mary Anne Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital, (Mich. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 23, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160655 & (23)(24) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra MARY ANNE MARKEL, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160655 COA: 350655 Oakland CC: 2018-164979-NH WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and HOSPITAL CONSULTANTS, PC, LINET LONAPPAN, MD, and IOANA MORARIU, Defendants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The motion for stay is GRANTED. Trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of that appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 23, 2020 a0122 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 23, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160655 & (23)(24) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra MARY ANNE MARKEL, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160655 COA: 350655 Oakland CC: 2018-164979-NH WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and HOSPITAL CONSULTANTS, PC, LINET LONAPPAN, MD, and IOANA MORARIU, Defendants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The motion for stay is GRANTED. Trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of that appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 23, 2020 a0122 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mary Anne Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-anne-markel-v-william-beaumont-hospital-mich-2020.