Mary Anna Polk v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, No. 71-1637 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409
This text of 447 F.2d 491 (Mary Anna Polk v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, No. 71-1637 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
447 F.2d 491
Mary Anna POLK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-1637 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 1, 1971.
Paul H. Holmes, Holmes & Dukes, Hattiesburg, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.
Rowland W. Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Sutherland & McKenzie, Hattiesburg, Miss., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from United States District Court, Southern District of Mississippi at Hattiesburg, Dan M. Russell, Jr., Chief Judge.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 F.2d 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-anna-polk-v-provident-life-and-accident-insurance-company-no-ca5-1971.