Mary Ann Lamkin v. Eugene Hartmeier
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 12, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160576(144) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement MARY ANN LAMKIN and STEVE LAMKIN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Justices SC: 160576 v COA: 326986 Livingston CC: 12-026600-NZ EUGENE HARTMEIER, CYNTHIA HARTMEIER, KEVIN HARTMEIER, DENNIS MCCOMB, GLORIA MCCOMB, DANIEL ENGRAM, DANIELLE ENGRAM, JAMES BEAUDOIN, CECILE LAUDENSLAGER, ANGELA CHRISTIE, KIMBERLY KRASKA, JOAN BEAUDOIN, AARON KIRBY, DAMON HARTMEIER, DENISE ENGRAM, DEANN ENGRAM, DEREK ENGRAM, CATHERINE BARRETT, Defendants-Appellees, and
RONALD THYBAULT and the Estate of MARY WECKESER, Defendants. ___________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees Engram and Kraska to extend the time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on February 7, 2020, is accepted as timely filed.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 12, 2020
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mary Ann Lamkin v. Eugene Hartmeier (Mary Ann Lamkin v. Eugene Hartmeier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.