Home/U.S. Customs Court/Marx v. United States

Marx v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marx v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 610 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 3, 1958·No. No. 62034; protest 315019-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel'that the merchandise consists of metal dime savings banks the same in all material respects as those the subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marx v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 586 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 586 (Marx v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M. Pressner & Co. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 262 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)