Marx v. McCloud

New York Supreme Court

Marx v. McCloud

14 N.Y. St. Rep. 931

DecidedFebruary 13, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.Y. St. Rep. 931 (Marx v. McCloud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marx v. McCloud, 14 N.Y. St. Rep. 931 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages f r unlawfully and wrongfully dispossessing the plaintiff from certain premises demised to him by*the defendant McCloud.

The cause was tried at the circuit, and the jury, besides rendering a verdict for the plaintiff, in answer to certain questions submitted for special answers, found facts in favor of the plaintiff which justified a recovery and sustain the • vervict.

There was no error, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

There is no appeal by the plaintiff.

Barnard, C. J., and Pratt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages f r unlawfully and wrongfully dispossessing the plaintiff from certain premises demised to him by*the defendant McCloud.

The cause was tried at the circuit, and the jury, besides rendering a verdict for the plaintiff, in answer to certain questions submitted for special answers, found facts in favor of the plaintiff which justified a recovery and sustain the • vervict.

There was no error, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

There is no appeal by the plaintiff.

Barnard, C. J., and Pratt, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.Y. St. Rep. 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marx-v-mccloud-nysupct-1888.