Marx v. Marx

279 A.D. 921, 110 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321

This text of 279 A.D. 921 (Marx v. Marx) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marx v. Marx, 279 A.D. 921, 110 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Comparing the proof adduced at the trial with the facts upon which the motion to vacate the judgment is based reveals that the movant’s showing is insufficient to "warrant the conclusion that a different result would ensue on a new trial. (Cook v. Cook, 342 U. S. 126; Dalton v. Dalton, 270 App. Div. 269, 273.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Cook
342 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 1952)
Dalton v. Dalton
270 A.D. 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 921, 110 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marx-v-marx-nyappdiv-1952.