Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Marx v. Marx

Marx v. Marx

279 A.D. 921, 110 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1952·Published

Opinion

Comparing the proof adduced at the trial with the facts upon which the motion to vacate the judgment is based reveals that the movant’s showing is insufficient to "warrant the conclusion that a different result would ensue on a new trial. (Cook v. Cook, 342 U. S. 126; Dalton v. Dalton, 270 App. Div. 269, 273.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marx v. Marx, 279 A.D. 921, 110 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

279 A.D. 921 (Marx v. Marx) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Cook
342 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 1952)
Dalton v. Dalton
270 A.D. 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)