Marx v. Logue

71 Miss. 905
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 Miss. 905 (Marx v. Logue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marx v. Logue, 71 Miss. 905 (Mich. 1894).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The demurrer to the plea of nil debet was properly sustained. The only general issue to an action on a judgmeut is nul tiel record.

The plea of the statute of limitations of three years is bad, because it does not aver that the person against whom the judgment was rendered was, at the time of the institution of the action, a resident of this state. Code 1892, § 2744. The record of the judgment was pi’operly authenticated, and the objection to its being read in evidence was properly oven-uled.

The .point that no evidence of the transfer of the judgment to the plaintiff was produced, is of no avail, for this specific objection was not made on trial, and the presumption is to be indulged that, if it had been thus made, it would have been successfully met; and, besides, the plea, nul tiel record, did not put in issue any such question. It should have been pleaded specially.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Gillespie
22 F.2d 807 (D. Delaware, 1927)
Taylor v. Board of Supervisors
74 Miss. 23 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 Miss. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marx-v-logue-miss-1894.