Marx v. Hilsendegen

9 N.W. 439, 46 Mich. 336, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 591

• Court: Michigan Supreme Court
• Decided: June 22, 1881
• Status: Published

Opinion

Marston, C. J.

There was no error in sustaining the objection made to the question asked the witness Fecht on cross-examination. Bissell v. Starr 32 Mich. 299.

Tbe court very properly denied defendant, during tbe trial, tbe privilege of tben interposing tbe plea of tbe statute of limitations in defence of tbe plaintiffs claim. To bave permitted tliis under the circumstances would bave been gross injustice to tbe plaintiff

There was evidence tending to show that Marx bad collected this money. Tbe case was fairly submitted and tbe judgment must be affirmed with costs.

Tbe other Justices concurred.