Marx v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided August 26, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-06195·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA CASE NO. 3:19-CV-6195-DWC Plaintiff, ORDER ON EAJA ATTORNEY FEE v. AWARD SECURITY, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $7,190.43 and expenses in the amount of $7.00 (postage), for a total of $7,197.43, shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and that costs in the amount of $419.00 (court filing $400.00, photocopies $19.00) should be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Teal M. Parham, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Teal M. Parham at 910 12th Avenue - PO Box 757, Longview, WA 98632. DATED this 26th day of August, 2020. A David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by: s/TEAL M. PARHAM Teal M. Parham WSB #21954 Attorney for Plaintiff Parham & Hall, PLLP 910 12th Avenue Longview WA 98632 Telephone: (360) 423-3810 Fax: (360) 423-3812 E-mail: tealparham@parhamhall.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marx v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Marx v. Commissioner of Social Security (Marx v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)