Marx, Jeffrey Steven
This text of Marx, Jeffrey Steven (Marx, Jeffrey Steven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-49,387-16
EX PARTE JEFFREY STEVEN MARX, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 7723G IN THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT FROM BURNET COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of
aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to life imprisonment for each count to run
concurrently with each other, but consecutively to a twenty-three year sentence in cause number
77693.
In his present application, Applicant raises two grounds. This application, however, presents
a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed six prior applications 2
pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues
that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented
in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders
v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his
repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4,
and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.
Therefore, we instruct the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals not to accept or file the
instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application pertaining to this conviction
unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims presented have not been
raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of
habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: October 10, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marx, Jeffrey Steven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marx-jeffrey-steven-texcrimapp-2018.