Marx Industrial Maintenance, Inc. v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Marx Industrial Maintenance, Inc. v. State

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 486, 1969 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 46

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided June 3, 1969·No. No. 5568·Published

Opinion

Perlin, C.J.

Claimant seeks recovery of the sum of $2,632.50 for landscape services at State License Centers. It appears that the services were performed by claimant for the Secretary of State, Purchasing Division.

The parties have stipulated that there is lawfully due the claimant the sum of $2,632.50. They further stipulate that, as a result of delay in billing by the claimant, payment was not made prior to the closing of the biennial appropriation.

Where a contract with the State has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; and, (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc., A Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all the requirements have been met in the instant case.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $2,632.50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perlin, C.J.

Claimant seeks recovery of the sum of $2,632.50 for landscape services at State License Centers. It appears that the services were performed by claimant for the Secretary of State, Purchasing Division.

The parties have stipulated that there is lawfully due the claimant the sum of $2,632.50. They further stipulate that, as a result of delay in billing by the claimant, payment was not made prior to the closing of the biennial appropriation.

Where a contract with the State has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; and, (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc., A Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all the requirements have been met in the instant case.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $2,632.50.

Marx Industrial Maintenance, Inc. v. State, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 486, 1969 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 46 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1969).

Pincite

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 486 (Marx Industrial Maintenance, Inc. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.