Marvin Williams v. State
This text of Marvin Williams v. State (Marvin Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MARVIN WILLIAMS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-15
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 9, 2017
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, William G. Law, Jr, Judge.
Tania Williams, of The Williams Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Marvin Williams (“Appellant”) appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.850 Motion for Postconviction Relief. Appellant raises three issues
upon appeal, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to: 1) file a motion in
limine to exclude improper comments on Appellant’s right to remain silent; 2) exclude identification of the firearm; and 3) suppress the firearm that Appellant alleges was
unlawfully seized.
As to the last two issues, we affirm without further discussion. As to the first issue,
we reverse and remand for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing or to make more
appropriate record attachments refuting the claim.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., and SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marvin Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-williams-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.