Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart

129 S.E. 190, 190 N.C. 854, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 200

DecidedSeptember 23, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 190 (Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart, 129 S.E. 190, 190 N.C. 854, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 200 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant failed to make good his allegation that the judgment, rendered in this cause, had been taken through surprise or excusable neglect. The judge finds the contrary to be true. It is also found as a fact that the defendant has no meritorious defense to the plaintiff’s suit. Hence, the motion was properly denied on both grounds. Livestock Co. v. Atkinson, 189 N. C., 250; Duffer v. Brunson, 188 N. C., 789; Bartholomew v. Parrish, ante, 151.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant failed to make good his allegation that the judgment, rendered in this cause, had been taken through surprise or excusable neglect. The judge finds the contrary to be true. It is also found as a fact that the defendant has no meritorious defense to the plaintiff’s suit. Hence, the motion was properly denied on both grounds. Livestock Co. v. Atkinson, 189 N. C., 250; Duffer v. Brunson, 188 N. C., 789; Bartholomew v. Parrish, ante, 151.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.E. 190, 190 N.C. 854, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-wade-co-v-stewart-nc-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack