Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart

129 S.E. 190, 190 N.C. 854, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 200
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 23, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant failed to make good his allegation that the judgment, rendered in this cause, had been taken through surprise or excusable neglect. The judge finds the contrary to be true. It is also found as a fact that the defendant has no meritorious defense to the plaintiff’s suit. Hence, the motion was properly denied on both grounds. Livestock Co. v. Atkinson, 189 N. C., 250; Duffer v. Brunson, 188 N. C., 789; Bartholomew v. Parrish, ante, 151.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart, 129 S.E. 190, 190 N.C. 854, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 200 (N.C. 1925).

129 S.E. 190 (Marvin Wade Co. v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duffer v. . Brunson
125 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Snow Hill Livestock Co. v. Atkinson
126 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)