Marvin v. Van Hoesen
2 How. Pr. 130
This text of 2 How. Pr. 130 (Marvin v. Van Hoesen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marvin v. Van Hoesen, 2 How. Pr. 130 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Held, that appeals from the circuit judge, under the statute of 1841, were not calendar causes, but [131]*131were subject to the practice of the special terms, and the party appealing was bound to bring his appeal to a hearing at the next special term after it was taken.
Motion was therefore denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-v-van-hoesen-nysupct-1846.