Marvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marvin v. State

907 So. 2d 687, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 2005 WL 1788890

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 2005

DocketNo. 1D04-77

StatusPublished

This text of 907 So. 2d 687 (Marvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marvin v. State, 907 So. 2d 687, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 2005 WL 1788890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this direct criminal appeal challenges his conviction and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked, in violation of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes. Because at least one of the predicate convictions for his current conviction of felony driving while license suspended or revoked was under a prior version of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes, this predicate conviction should not have been relied upon in imposing judgment and sentence in the present case. Thompson v. State, 887 So.2d 1260 (Fla.2004); Huss v. State, 771 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, as the state concedes, the appellant’s judgment and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked must be, and are hereby, reversed.

ALLEN, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this direct criminal appeal challenges his conviction and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked, in violation of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes. Because at least one of the predicate convictions for his current conviction of felony driving while license suspended or revoked was under a prior version of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes, this predicate conviction should not have been relied upon in imposing judgment and sentence in the present case. Thompson v. State, 887 So.2d 1260 (Fla.2004); Huss v. State, 771 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, as the state concedes, the appellant’s judgment and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked must be, and are hereby, reversed.

ALLEN, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

907 So. 2d 687, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 2005 WL 1788890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack