Marvin v. State

907 So. 2d 687, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 2005 WL 1788890
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2005·No. No. 1D04-77·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this direct criminal appeal challenges his conviction and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked, in violation of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes. Because at least one of the predicate convictions for his current conviction of felony driving while license suspended or revoked was under a prior version of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes, this predicate conviction should not have been relied upon in imposing judgment and sentence in the present case. Thompson v. State, 887 So.2d 1260 (Fla.2004); Huss v. State, 771 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, as the state concedes, the appellant’s judgment and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked must be, and are hereby, reversed.

ALLEN, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marvin v. State, 907 So. 2d 687, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11849, 2005 WL 1788890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

907 So. 2d 687 (Marvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
887 So. 2d 1260 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Huss v. State
771 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)