Marvin v. Herrick

5 Wend. 109
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1830·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

By lire provisions of the revised statutes no judgment is valid so as to authorize any proceedings thereon until the record thereof is filed. 2 R, S. 360, § 11. It is objected that the issuing of the execution before the filing of the record is a mere irregularity, and that no one but the defendant in the execution can avail himself thereof; 8 Johns. R. 365; 1 Wendell, 31; but the issuing of the execution in the second above entitled cause previous to the filing of the record, was nota mere irregularity ; the execution itself was void, or a mere nullity, until the record was filed. Allowing it to become operative when the record was filed, the execution in the other cause had obtained the preference, it being delivered to the officer at. eleven A. M. and the other not becoming’ operative until near three, P. M. The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marvin v. Herrick, 5 Wend. 109 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 Wend. 109 (Marvin v. Herrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Cherrier
43 N.W. 828 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)
Baker v. Barber
16 Ill. App. 621 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Morris v. . Patchin
24 N.Y. 394 (New York Court of Appeals, 1862)
Blivin v. Bleakley
23 How. Pr. 124 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Macomber v. Mayor of New York
17 Abb. Pr. 35 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1860)
Clute v. Clute
4 Denio 241 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
Bank of Rochester v. Emerson
10 Paige Ch. 115 (New York Court of Chancery, 1843)
Walters & Farley v. Sykes & Harman
22 Wend. 566 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)