Marvin v. Goldhurst
This text of 226 A.D. 758 (Marvin v. Goldhurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In an action upon an account stated the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice when the answer generally denies the allegations of the complaint and the defendant’s affidavit in opposition to the motion to strike out the answer and for judgment shows that an issue of fact as to whether there was an account stated is presented. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-v-goldhurst-nyappdiv-1929.