Marvin Miller v. United States
422 U.S. 1024, 95 S. Ct. 2619, 45 L. Ed. 2d 683, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 2046
Opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regu[1025] lation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below: 505 F. 2d 1247.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marvin Miller v. United States, 422 U.S. 1024, 95 S. Ct. 2619, 45 L. Ed. 2d 683, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 2046 (1975).
422 U.S. 1024 (Marvin Miller v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roth v. United States
354 U.S. 476 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Miller v. California
413 U.S. 15 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
413 U.S. 49 (Supreme Court, 1973)
United States v. Marvin Miller
455 F.2d 899 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Marvin Miller
505 F.2d 1247 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
Miller v. United States
413 U.S. 913 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Romanus v. California
413 U.S. 914 (Supreme Court, 1973)