Marvin L. Gehman v. Francis R. Smith, Collector of Internal Revenue

Third Circuit

Marvin L. Gehman v. Francis R. Smith, Collector of Internal Revenue

203 F.2d 953, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4278

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 1953

Docket10956

StatusPublished

This text of 203 F.2d 953 (Marvin L. Gehman v. Francis R. Smith, Collector of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marvin L. Gehman v. Francis R. Smith, Collector of Internal Revenue, 203 F.2d 953, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4278 (3d Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and the record and have considered carefully the oral arguments of the parties in this case. Smith as Collector of Internal Revenue assessed against and collected from Gehman the sum of $4,289.40 as taxes. See sections 2321 and 3206 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. Gehman sued Smith to obtain a refund of the full amount. The court below properly held that of the sum of $4,289.40 assessed, $4,037.40 was correct in amount and was assessed in accordance with the laws of the United States. The court below held álso that the assessment of $252.00 against .the appellant was improper and unlawful since it was assessed against a ‘product not constituting “adulterated butter”. The court thereupon gave judgment in favor of the appellant in the sum of $252.00. The appellant took the instant appeal in an attempt to collect from Smith the balance of $4,037.40.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court below are correct in every particular. See 105 F.Supp. 604. The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and the record and have considered carefully the oral arguments of the parties in this case. Smith as Collector of Internal Revenue assessed against and collected from Gehman the sum of $4,289.40 as taxes. See sections 2321 and 3206 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. Gehman sued Smith to obtain a refund of the full amount. The court below properly held that of the sum of $4,289.40 assessed, $4,037.40 was correct in amount and was assessed in accordance with the laws of the United States. The court below held álso that the assessment of $252.00 against .the appellant was improper and unlawful since it was assessed against a ‘product not constituting “adulterated butter”. The court thereupon gave judgment in favor of the appellant in the sum of $252.00. The appellant took the instant appeal in an attempt to collect from Smith the balance of $4,037.40.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court below are correct in every particular. See 105 F.Supp. 604. The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 F.2d 953, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-l-gehman-v-francis-r-smith-collector-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack