Marvin L. Dietrich and Marjorie Dietrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

503 F.2d 1379, 34 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6001, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6736, 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9754
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 25, 1974·No. 74-1276·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and oral argument, the Court has concluded that the factual findings of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous, that its decision is based upon a correct interpretation of the law as applied to the pleadings and the facts of the case, and that an opinion would have no precedential value. See Leathers v. United States, 471 F.2d 856 (8th Cir. 1972); Wertzberger v. United States, 441 F.2d 1166 (8th Cir. 1971). For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed without opinion.

See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marvin L. Dietrich and Marjorie Dietrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 503 F.2d 1379, 34 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6001, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6736, 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9754 (8th Cir. 1974).

503 F.2d 1379 (Marvin L. Dietrich and Marjorie Dietrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yarlott v. Comm'r
78 T.C. No. 41 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Burstein v. United States
622 F.2d 529 (Court of Claims, 1980)
Liang v. Commissioner
1975 T.C. Memo. 297 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)