Marvin L. Dietrich and Marjorie Dietrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 503 F.2d 1379 (Marvin L. Dietrich and Marjorie Dietrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and oral argument, the Court has concluded that the factual findings of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous, that its decision is based upon a correct interpretation of the law as applied to the pleadings and the facts of the case, and that an opinion would have no precedential value. See Leathers v. United States, 471 F.2d 856 (8th Cir. 1972); Wertzberger v. United States, 441 F.2d 1166 (8th Cir. 1971). For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed without opinion.
See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 F.2d 1379, 34 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6001, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6736, 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-l-dietrich-and-marjorie-dietrich-v-commissioner-of-internal-ca8-1974.