Marvin Gutierrez v. Merrick B. Garland

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 2023
Docket23-1555
StatusUnpublished

This text of Marvin Gutierrez v. Merrick B. Garland (Marvin Gutierrez v. Merrick B. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marvin Gutierrez v. Merrick B. Garland, (8th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-1555 ___________________________

Marvin Lopez Gutierrez

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________

Submitted: November 27, 2023 Filed: November 30, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan native and citizen Marvin Lopez Gutierrez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of withholding of removal. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the agency did not err in determining that Lopez Gutierrez failed to show there was a clear probability that his life or freedom would be threatened in Guatemala because of his membership in a particular social group, the only protected ground he asserted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A); Mayorga-Rosa v. Sessions, 888 F.3d 379, 382 (8th Cir. 2018). This court has repeatedly held that resistance to gang membership does not present a cognizable particular social group, and Lopez Gutierrez has offered no evidence or argument that would warrant a different result in his case. See, e.g., Tojin-Tiu v. Garland, 33 F.4th 1020, 1024 (8th Cir. 2022); Juarez Chilel v. Holder, 779 F.3d 850, 855 (8th Cir. 2015); Ortiz-Puentes v. Holder, 662 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 2011). Because this issue is dispositive of Lopez Gutierrez’s claim, we decline to address his other arguments. See Uriostegui-Teran v. Garland, 72 F.4th 852, 856 (8th Cir. 2023); Miranda v. Sessions, 892 F.3d 940, 944 (8th Cir. 2018).

Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ortiz-Puentes v. Holder
662 F.3d 481 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Carlos Chilel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
779 F.3d 850 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
Carlos Mayorga-Rosa v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III
888 F.3d 379 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Henry Miranda v. Jefferson Sessions, III
892 F.3d 940 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Diego Tojin-Tiu v. Merrick Garland
33 F.4th 1020 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)
Efren Uriostegui-Teran v. Merrick Garland
72 F.4th 852 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marvin Gutierrez v. Merrick B. Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-gutierrez-v-merrick-b-garland-ca8-2023.