Marvin Eugene Gates, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director of TDCJ-ID
This text of Marvin Eugene Gates, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director of TDCJ-ID (Marvin Eugene Gates, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director of TDCJ-ID) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-21-00345-CR
MARVIN EUGENE GATES, JR., Appellant v.
BOBBY LUMPKIN, DIRECTOR OF TDCJ-ID, Appellee
United States District Court Western District of Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 20, 2021, Marvin Eugene Gates Jr., filed a pro se “Writ of
Supersedeas” in this Court, complaining about the dismissal of his application for writ of
habeas corpus filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
and seeking to proceed with an appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We lack jurisdiction over
any aspect of federal habeas-corpus proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) (stating that
“[t]he [U.S.] Supreme Court, a Justice thereof, a circuit judge, or a district court shall
entertain an application for a writ of habeas corpus [o]n behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in
violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.”); see also Slagle v.
State, No. 02-16-00097-CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 4468, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr.
28, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam); In re Commitment of Goodwin, No. 01-14-00734-
CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 11915, at **1-2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 30, 2014,
no pet.) (mem. op.). We therefore dismiss this proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
Gates may file a motion for rehearing with this Court within fifteen (15) days after
the opinion and judgment are rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If Gates desires to have
the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that
petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty (30) days after
either this Court’s judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing
was overruled by this Court. See id. at R. 68.2(a).
STEVE SMITH Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 22, 2021 Do not publish [CR25]
Gates v. Lumpkin Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marvin Eugene Gates, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director of TDCJ-ID, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-eugene-gates-jr-v-bobby-lumpkin-director-of-tdcj-id-texapp-2021.