Marvin Emory Whittington v. K.E. Criner G.S. Baker Officer Orange the City of Roanoke, Va

57 F.3d 1068, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21871, 1995 WL 365664
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 1995
Docket94-6748
StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1068 (Marvin Emory Whittington v. K.E. Criner G.S. Baker Officer Orange the City of Roanoke, Va) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marvin Emory Whittington v. K.E. Criner G.S. Baker Officer Orange the City of Roanoke, Va, 57 F.3d 1068, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21871, 1995 WL 365664 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

57 F.3d 1068
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Marvin Emory WHITTINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
K.E. CRINER; G.S. Baker; Officer Orange; The City of
Roanoke, VA, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6748.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 1995.
Decided June 19, 1995.

Marvin Emory Whittington, Appellant Pro Se. Wilburn Charles Dibling, Jr., City Attorney, William X. Parsons, Assistant City Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a jury verdict in favor of three Defendants and the court's directed verdict in favor of one Defendant in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) action in which he alleged use of excessive force during his arrest. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order entering judgment for the Defendants. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 F.3d 1068, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21871, 1995 WL 365664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-emory-whittington-v-ke-criner-gs-baker-offi-ca4-1995.