Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2012·No. 14-11-00149-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted; Order filed February 2, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00149-CR

MARVIN DWAYNE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1147188

ORDER

On November 29, 2011, this court abated the appeal on appellant’s motion because appellant argued he was denied counsel during the thirty-day time period for filing a motion for new trial. Appellant has now filed a motion to supplement the record with his motion for new trial, the record of the hearing on the motion, and the court’s ruling.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before February 21, 2012, containing appellant’s motion for new trial, the trial court’s ruling, and any other supporting documents regarding appellant’s motion for new trial.

Janet Ragan, the official court reporter of the 230th District Court, is ordered to file a reporter’s record of the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. If no record was taken, the court reporter should file a document with this court notifying the court that no record was taken.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State (Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.