Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State
This text of Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State (Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted; Order filed February 2, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-11-00149-CR ____________
MARVIN DWAYNE SMITH, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1147188
ORDER
On November 29, 2011, this court abated the appeal on appellant’s motion because appellant argued he was denied counsel during the thirty-day time period for filing a motion for new trial. Appellant has now filed a motion to supplement the record with his motion for new trial, the record of the hearing on the motion, and the court’s ruling.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before February 21, 2012, containing appellant’s motion for new trial, the trial court’s ruling, and any other supporting documents regarding appellant’s motion for new trial. Janet Ragan, the official court reporter of the 230th District Court, is ordered to file a reporter’s record of the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. If no record was taken, the court reporter should file a document with this court notifying the court that no record was taken.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marvin Dwayne Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-dwayne-smith-v-state-texapp-2012.